Skip to content

updated to add the new 3.0 scope hoisting flag #1309

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 20, 2017
Merged

updated to add the new 3.0 scope hoisting flag #1309

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 20, 2017

Conversation

maraisr
Copy link
Contributor

@maraisr maraisr commented Jun 19, 2017

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@skipjack skipjack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@maraisr can you just fix the table formatting so it's consistent with the rest of the doc? Aside from that this looks great, thanks!

@simon04
Copy link
Collaborator

simon04 commented Jun 20, 2017

For the reference, this documents webpack/webpack#4951.

| --sort-chunks-by | Sorts the chunks list by property in chunk | string |
| --sort-modules-by | Sorts the modules list by property in module | string |
| --verbose | Show more details | boolean |
| --display-optimization-bailout | Scope hoisting fallback trigger | boolean |
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add "(since webpack 3.0.0)". Good otherwise 👍.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh yes, and please restore the alphabetical ordering.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool mate - would love too.

@simon04 simon04 merged commit f349f62 into webpack:master Jun 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants