-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 513
Fixing the CI #3391
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing the CI #3391
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They changed from count to resourceCount and back in some releases, I hope we don't have to adjust the tests again new release :D
Describe changes
IPython display issues
Fixed faulty imports in our utils module based on Stefan's previous changes.
The dockerfiles permission issue
Our docker dev files were updated last week, that ended up creating a permission issue. The tests that uses these files did not catch this error in the original PR's CI, because our CI doesn't trigger on changes to these dockerfiles. I have changed that as well. The missing part of our CI will now run on the changes to the
docker/
files.Fixing the failing
gcp
orchestrator tests due to the newkfp
releaseLast week, Kubeflow Pipelines SDK released a new version 2.12. With this version, they included some changes that changed the way they handled resource configurations.
In the earlier versions, when we compiled a pipeline with
kfp
, the resulting pipeline json had duplicated values in its deployment spec:With their latest changes, the duplicated values are now removed. Since we were checking these values in our tests, I have adjusted our tests.
Also, since we do not limit the
kfp
version, we might run into another dependency issue in the future which might force us to runkfp<2.12.0
again in the future. That's why I adjusted the test not to compare the dicts directly but to check whether the expected values are placed correctly. This way the tests are adaptable to bothkfp>=2.12
andkfp<2.12
.Pre-requisites
Please ensure you have done the following:
develop
and the open PR is targetingdevelop
. If your branch wasn't based on develop read Contribution guide on rebasing branch to develop.Types of changes