Skip to content

Extended deployment timeout #11729

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2016

Conversation

soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh commented Nov 2, 2016

This extended one of the timeouts we have in our deployment tests, I've noticed at least one occurrence, where the pod got into ready state right after we've timed out. Not sure how much this will help with #10228, but it's worth the shot at this point in time to decrease the level of flakes.

@mfojtik fyi

@@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ var _ = g.Describe("deploymentconfigs", func() {
o.Expect(err).NotTo(o.HaveOccurred())

g.By(fmt.Sprintf("by checking that the second deployment exists"))
err = wait.PollImmediate(500*time.Millisecond, 30*time.Second, func() (bool, error) {
// TODO when #11016 gets fixed this can be reverted to 30seconds
err = wait.PollImmediate(500*time.Millisecond, 1*time.Minute, func() (bool, error) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add a comment to that issue and open the revert PR so we don't forget

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A bunch of the deployment tests have bumped timeouts, not sure if a single revert is enough. I would opt for a follow-up issue to #10228 where we should revisit times in all deployment tests.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've opened #11732 and added this PR there, @Kargakis can you add other changes you know of, so it's easier to nail them down faster.

@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor

Will do once we get to fix the issue

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Maciej Szulik [email protected]
wrote:

@soltysh commented on this pull request.

In test/extended/deployments/deployments.go
#11729:

@@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ var _ = g.Describe("deploymentconfigs", func() {
o.Expect(err).NotTo(o.HaveOccurred())

      g.By(fmt.Sprintf("by checking that the second deployment exists"))
  •     err = wait.PollImmediate(500_time.Millisecond, 30_time.Second, func() (bool, error) {
    
  •     // TODO when #11016 gets fixed this can be reverted to 30seconds
    
  •     err = wait.PollImmediate(500_time.Millisecond, 1_time.Minute, func() (bool, error) {
    

I've opened #11732 #11732 and
added this PR there, @Kargakis https://github.com/kargakis can you add
other changes you know of, so it's easier to nail them down faster.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#11729, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADuFf6TDdHiLR_h2-1-gZKxWHwtkqtzWks5q6Kg3gaJpZM4KnVOL
.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Nov 2, 2016

@liggitt if that sounds good to you, can you please tag this one for merge?

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Nov 2, 2016

[test]

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Nov 2, 2016

Flake #11406.

re-[test]

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Nov 3, 2016

Flake #11016 #11057

re-[test]

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented Nov 3, 2016

flake: #10773

[test]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to 185d7cf

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/11049/) (Base Commit: 75ed7e1)

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Nov 3, 2016

@mfojtik merge this might drop the flake by one, at least

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented Nov 3, 2016

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Nov 3, 2016

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/11049/) (Image: devenv-rhel7_5309)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to 185d7cf

@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 0cb9a7c into openshift:master Nov 3, 2016
@soltysh soltysh deleted the ext_deployment_timeout branch November 4, 2016 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants