Skip to content

Initial tests for Two Nodes OCP with Fencing (TNF) cluster #29833

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

clobrano
Copy link

@clobrano clobrano commented May 21, 2025

Add initial topology tests

  • Ensure correct number of ControlPlanes, Workers, Arbiters
  • Ensure correct number of static etcd pod containers
  • Ensure correct number of podman etcd containers

Add initial behavior tests

  • Ensure the cluster can handle a graceful node shutdown

Closes: OCPEDGE-1481, OCPEDGE-1482

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from p0lyn0mial and sjenning May 21, 2025 09:32
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 21, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: clobrano
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign neisw for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@clobrano clobrano marked this pull request as draft May 22, 2025 07:55
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 22, 2025
@clobrano
Copy link
Author

Temporarily converting it to draft to investigate a crash

@clobrano clobrano marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2025 13:18
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 22, 2025
@clobrano
Copy link
Author

Ready again for review

Add initial topology tests
* Ensure correct number of ControlPlanes, Workers, Arbiters
* Ensure correct number of static etcd pod containers
* Ensure correct number of podman etcd containers

Add initial behavior tests
* Ensure the cluster can handle a graceful node shutdown

Closes: OCPEDGE-1481, OCPEDGE-1482
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 22, 2025

@clobrano: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2 fe755b3 link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial fe755b3 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade fe755b3 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback fe755b3 link false /test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-disruptive fe755b3 link false /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn fe755b3 link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling fe755b3 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout fe755b3 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling fe755b3 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling fe755b3 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling fe755b3 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2 fe755b3 link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade fe755b3 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6 fe755b3 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 fe755b3 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
ci/prow/lint fe755b3 link true /test lint
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive fe755b3 link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-1of2 fe755b3 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-1of2
ci/prow/okd-e2e-gcp fe755b3 link false /test okd-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/verify-deps fe755b3 link true /test verify-deps
ci/prow/verify fe755b3 link true /test verify

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented May 22, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: fe755b3

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive Medium
[bz-Etcd] clusteroperator/etcd should not change condition/Available
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
---
[sig-node] static pods should start after being created
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling Low
[bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
---
[bz-kube-storage-version-migrator] clusteroperator/kube-storage-version-migrator should not change condition/Available
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant