Skip to content

Validate the refs exists #164

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023
Merged

Validate the refs exists #164

merged 15 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

ribeiromiranda
Copy link
Contributor

Add validator with context to validate the refs (functions, events, retries, etc) exists

@ribeiromiranda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ricardozanini To solve the unit test that PR (involve the default values of Function.Operation), I want to wait for PR #159.

@ricardozanini
Copy link
Member

#159 should be merged soon.

@ricardozanini
Copy link
Member

@ribeiromiranda any updates on this one?

@ribeiromiranda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ricardozanini Yes, but I didn't push it because there's a lot of unit testing to fix.

Copy link
Member

@ricardozanini ricardozanini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ribeiromiranda, this is awesome work. Many many thanks for this. I imagine you're still working on it, right?

Apart from that, can you join the CNCF Slack, #serverless-workflow-sdk channel? I need to talk to you. Just send me a PM. :)

}

func init() {
// TODO: create states graph to complex check
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we have a follow-up issue to have it documented?

@ricardozanini ricardozanini linked an issue Jun 13, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@ricardozanini
Copy link
Member

@ribeiromiranda are you still working on this, right? Please let me know when ready so we can have a final look + merge.

@ribeiromiranda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ribeiromiranda are you still working on this, right? Please let me know when ready so we can have a final look + merge.

@ricardozanini No more changes.

@ricardozanini
Copy link
Member

@ribeiromiranda are you still working on this, right? Please let me know when ready so we can have a final look + merge.

@ricardozanini No more changes.

Can you take a look at the CI errors, then? So we can merge after it. cc @spolti

@ribeiromiranda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ricardozanini @spolti CI errors fixed.

Copy link
Member

@ricardozanini ricardozanini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Copy link
Member

@spolti spolti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really nice :)

@ricardozanini
Copy link
Member

Waiting for #178

André R. de Miranda added 4 commits July 11, 2023 07:42
…etries, etc) exists

Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <[email protected]>
André R. de Miranda added 11 commits July 11, 2023 07:42
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: André R. de Miranda <[email protected]>
@ribeiromiranda
Copy link
Contributor Author

Waiting for #178

@ricardozanini Made the rebase with the main branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cyclic import between validator and model packages
3 participants